diff options
author | Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com> | 2011-03-23 07:39:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com> | 2011-03-23 07:39:13 +0100 |
commit | 816c0b99e7f0395b26f8a8c26e52110107f0b1e1 (patch) | |
tree | 29ee587246984f705bb90243892de95b2480906e | |
parent | ead7ff428c14cbfd3a84723f8abae13d5ea79330 (diff) | |
download | lombok-816c0b99e7f0395b26f8a8c26e52110107f0b1e1.tar.gz lombok-816c0b99e7f0395b26f8a8c26e52110107f0b1e1.tar.bz2 lombok-816c0b99e7f0395b26f8a8c26e52110107f0b1e1.zip |
Updated documentation of XArgsConstructor to highlight that we won't/can't remove
suppressConstructorProperties until GWT and Android get the CP annotation.
See issue #202
-rw-r--r-- | website/features/Constructor.html | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/website/features/Constructor.html b/website/features/Constructor.html index 072e46ed..c0ab9ef8 100644 --- a/website/features/Constructor.html +++ b/website/features/Constructor.html @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ </p><p> <code>@XArgsConstructor</code> can also be used on an enum definition. The generated constructor will always be private, because non-private constructors aren't legal in enums. You don't have to specify <code>AccessLevel.PRIVATE</code>. + </p><p> + While <code>suppressConstructorProperties</code> has been marked deprecated in anticipation of a world where all java environments have the + <code>@ConstructorProperties</code> annotation available, first GWT 2.2 and Android 2.3.3, which do not (yet) have this annotation, will have + to be ancient history before this annotation parameter will be removed. </p> </div> </div> |