aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/website/features/Data.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorReinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com>2014-03-04 23:16:49 +0100
committerReinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com>2014-03-04 23:16:49 +0100
commitf956ba1e337699206052a016da65f4f02ac6825b (patch)
tree53b0c638275ebfa8a3d1133c1d389ef700460572 /website/features/Data.html
parente5574133363c8b718329e07a73bf161416485da5 (diff)
parentfbab1ca77cb8306843e26c5bad91186b34563282 (diff)
downloadlombok-f956ba1e337699206052a016da65f4f02ac6825b.tar.gz
lombok-f956ba1e337699206052a016da65f4f02ac6825b.tar.bz2
lombok-f956ba1e337699206052a016da65f4f02ac6825b.zip
[configuration] Merge branch 'master' as we work on configuration.
* Conflict due to adding topic() feature to logger in master, and 'field name' feature in config branch. * master has since updated to shiny new eclipse dep versions and the 'ant eclipseForDebugging' feature, but this branch added deps. Addressed that. * Renamed 'loggerCategory' to 'loggerTopic'. I know, that wasn't exactly right to do in a merge, but, there you have it. * Test infrastructure changed in configuration branch, and tests had been added in master branch. Conflicts: build.xml buildScripts/ivy.xml src/core/lombok/eclipse/handlers/HandleLog.java src/core/lombok/extern/apachecommons/CommonsLog.java src/core/lombok/extern/java/Log.java src/core/lombok/extern/log4j/Log4j.java src/core/lombok/extern/log4j/Log4j2.java src/core/lombok/javac/handlers/HandleLog.java test/transform/resource/after-ecj/ValInTryWithResources.java
Diffstat (limited to 'website/features/Data.html')
-rw-r--r--website/features/Data.html2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/website/features/Data.html b/website/features/Data.html
index ad3aa892..4d6e5609 100644
--- a/website/features/Data.html
+++ b/website/features/Data.html
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
</p><p>
If the class already contains a method with the same name as any method that would normally be generated, that method is not generated, and no warning or
error is emitted. For example, if you already have a method with signature <code>void hashCode(int a, int b, int c)</code>, no <code>int hashCode()</code>
- method will be generated, even though technically <code>int hashCode()</code> is an entirely different method. The same rule applies to the constructor,
+ method will be generated, even though technically <code>int hashCode()</code> is an entirely different method. The same rule applies to the constructor (any explicit constructor will prevent <code>@Data</code> from generating one),
<code>toString</code>, <code>equals</code>, and all getters and setters.
</p><p>
<code>@Data</code> can handle generics parameters for fields just fine. In order to reduce the boilerplate when constructing objects for classes with