[website] Updating feature and experimental overviews to properly include the With promotion.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/website/templates/features/With.html b/website/templates/features/With.html
index 35c52dab..f1719e19 100644
--- a/website/templates/features/With.html
+++ b/website/templates/features/With.html
@@ -14,13 +14,14 @@
 		</p><p>
 			For example, if you create <code>public class Point { private final int x, y; }</code>, setters make no sense because the fields are final. <code>@With</code> can generate a <code>withX(int newXValue)</code> method for you which will return a new point with the supplied value for <code>x</code> and the same value for <code>y</code>.
 		</p><p>
+			The <code>@With</code> relies on a constructor for all fields in order to do its work. If this constructor does not exist, your <code>@With</code> annotation will result in a compile time error message. Lombok's own <a href="/features/constructor"><code>@AllArgsConstructor</code></a>. As <a href="/features/Value"><code>Value</code></a> will automatically produce an all args constructor as well, you can use that too. It's of course also acceptable if you manually write this constructor. It must contain all non-static fields, in the same lexical order.
+		</p><p>
 			Like <a href="/features/GetterSetter"><code>@Setter</code></a>, you can specify an access level in case you want the generated with method to be something other than <code>public</code>:<br /> <code>@With(level = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)</code>. Also like <a href="/features/GetterSetter"><code>@Setter</code></a>, you can also put a <code>@With</code> annotation on a type, which means a <code>with</code> method is generated for each field (even non-final fields).
 		</p><p>
 			To put annotations on the generated method, you can use <code>onMethod=@__({@AnnotationsHere})</code>. Be careful though! This is an experimental feature. For more details see the documentation on the <a href="/features/experimental/onX">onX</a> feature.
 		</p><p>
 			javadoc on the field will be copied to generated with methods. Normally, all text is copied, and <code>@param</code> is <em>moved</em> to the with method, whilst <code>@return</code> lines are stripped from the with method's javadoc. Moved means: Deleted from the field's javadoc. It is also possible to define unique text for the with method's javadoc. To do that, you create a 'section' named <code>WITH</code>. A section is a line in your javadoc containing 2 or more dashes, then the text 'WITH', followed by 2 or more dashes, and nothing else on the line. If you use sections, <code>@return</code> and <code>@param</code> stripping / copying for that section is no longer done (move the <code>@param</code> line into the section).
-		</p><p>
-			If you have a hierarchical immutable data structure, the <a href="/features/experimental/WithBy"><code>@WithBy</code></a> feature might be more suitable than <code>@With</code>
+		</p>
 	</@f.overview>
 
 	<@f.snippets name="With" />
@@ -45,8 +46,6 @@
 		</p><p>
 			No method is generated if any method already exists with the same name (case insensitive) and same parameter count. For example, <code>withX(int x)</code> will not be generated if there's already a method <code>withX(String... x)</code> even though it is technically possible to make the method. This caveat exists to prevent confusion. If the generation of a method is skipped for this reason, a warning is emitted instead. Varargs count as 0 to N parameters.
 		</p><p>
-			For <code>boolean</code> fields that start with <code>is</code> immediately followed by a title-case letter, nothing is prefixed to generate the wither name.
-		</p><p>
 			Various well known annotations about nullity cause null checks to be inserted and will be copied to the parameter. See <a href="/features/GetterSetter">Getter/Setter</a> documentation's small print for more information.
 		</p>
 	</@f.smallPrint>