diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'website/features/experimental/Accessors.html')
-rw-r--r-- | website/features/experimental/Accessors.html | 103 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html b/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bbcd80bb --- /dev/null +++ b/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html><head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> + <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../logi/reset.css" /> + <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../features.css" /> + <link rel="shortcut icon" href="../../favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" /> + <meta name="description" content="Spice up your java" /> + <title>EXPERIMENTAL - @Accessors</title> +</head><body><div id="pepper"> + <div class="minimumHeight"></div> + <div class="meat"> + <div class="header"><a href="../../index.html">Project Lombok</a></div> + <h1>@Accessors</h1> + <div class="byline">A more fluent API for getters and setters.</div> + <div class="since"> + <h3>Since</h3> + <p> + @Accessors was introduced as experimental feature in lombok v0.10.10. + </p> + </div> + <div class="experimental"> + <h3>Experimental</h3> + <p> + Experimental because: + <ul> + <li>We may want to roll these features into a more complete property support concept.</li> + <li>New feature - community feedback requested.</li> + </ul> + Current status: <em>positive</em> - Currently we feel this feature may move out of experimental status with no or minor changes soon. + </div> + <div class="overview"> + <h3>Overview</h3> + <p> + The <code>@Accessors</code> annotation is used to configure how lombok generates and looks for getters and setters. + </p><p> + By default, lombok follows the <em>bean specification</em> for getters and setters: The getter for a field named <code>pepper</code> + is <code>getPepper</code> for example. However, some might like to break with the <em>bean specification</em> in order to end up with + nicer looking APIs. <code>@Accessors</code> lets you do this. + </p><p> + Some programmers like to use a prefix for their fields, i.e. they write <code>fPepper</code> instead of <code>pepper</code>. + We <em>strongly</em> discourage doing this, as you can't unit test the validity of your prefixes, and refactor scripts may turn fields + into local variables or method names. Furthermore, your tools (such as your editor) can take care of rendering the identifier in a + certain way if you want this information to be instantly visible. Nevertheless, you can list the prefixes that your project uses via + <code>@Accessors</code> as well. + </p><p> + <code>@Accessors</code> therefore has 3 options:<ul> + <li><code>fluent</code> - A boolean. If <em>true</em>, the getter for <code>pepper</code> is just <code>pepper()</code>, and the + setter is <code>pepper(T newValue)</code>. Furthermore, unless specified, <code>chain</code> defaults to <em>true</em>.<br /> + Default: <em>false</em>.</li> + <li><code>chain</code> - A boolean. If <em>true</em>, generated setters return <code>this</code> instead of <code>void</code>.<br /> + Default: <em>false</em>, unless <code>fluent=true</code>, then Default: <em>true</em>.</li> + <li><code>prefix</code> - A list of strings. If present, fields must be prefixed with any of these prefixes. Each field name is + compared to each prefix in the list in turn, and if a match is found, the prefix is stripped out to create the base name for + the field. It is legal to include an empty string in the list, which will always match. For characters which are letters, the + character following the prefix must not be a lowercase letter, i.e. <code>pepper</code> is not a match even to prefix <code>p</code>, + but <code>pEpper</code> would be (and would mean the base name of this field is <code>epper</code>).</li> + </p><p> + The <code>@Accessors</code> annotation is legal on types and fields; the annotation that applies is the one on the field if present, + otherwise the one on the class. When a <code>@Accessors</code> annotation on a field is present, any <code>@Accessors</code> annotation + also present on that field's type is ignored. + </p> + </div> + <div class="snippets"> + <div class="pre"> + <h3>With Lombok</h3> + <div class="snippet">@HTML_PRE@</div> + </div> + <div class="sep"></div> + <div class="post"> + <h3>Vanilla Java</h3> + <div class="snippet">@HTML_POST@</div> + </div> + </div> + <div style="clear: left;"></div> + <div class="overview"> + <h3>Small print</h3><div class="smallprint"> + <p> + The nearest <code>@Accessors</code> annotation is also used for the various methods in lombok that look for getters, such as + <code>@EqualsAndHashCode</code>. + </p><p> + If a prefix list is provided and a field does not start with one of them, that field is skipped entirely by lombok, and + a warning will be generated. + </p> + </div> + </div> + <div class="footer"> + <a href="index.html">Back to experimental features</a> | <span class="disabled">Previous feature</span> | <span class="disabled">Next feature</span><br /> + <a href="../../credits.html" class="creditsLink">credits</a> | <span class="copyright">Copyright © 2009-2012 The Project Lombok Authors, licensed under the <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php">MIT license</a>.</span> + </div> + <div style="clear: both;"></div> + </div> +</div> +<script type="text/javascript"> + var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); + document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); +</script> +<script type="text/javascript"> + try { + var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9884254-1"); + pageTracker._trackPageview(); + } catch(err) {} +</script> +</body></html> |