From 1d85326769ddbeed3370b7a6256d86f3f787a29b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier@tipit.to>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:51:12 +0200
Subject: No retention at all seems much smarter, because then it wouldn't be
 neccessary to have the lombok.jar in the deployment path of whatever you
 write WITH lombok, which is a good idea.

Though - rewriting to e.g. a Lombok.sneakyThrow() call would require lombok.jar anyway. We'll cross that bridge when we get there.
---
 src/lombok/Getter.java | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src')

diff --git a/src/lombok/Getter.java b/src/lombok/Getter.java
index d6a10547..a714ead4 100644
--- a/src/lombok/Getter.java
+++ b/src/lombok/Getter.java
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
 import java.lang.annotation.Target;
 
 @Target(ElementType.FIELD)
-@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
+@Retention(RetentionPolicy.SOURCE)
 public @interface Getter {
 	AccessLevel value() default lombok.AccessLevel.PUBLIC;
 }
-- 
cgit