From a382c21d464c22658e8c2eea7d7d75c2a6747527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Reinier Zwitserloot Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:18:58 +0200 Subject: fixed issue 391: Using 'staticConstructor' on @Data whilst an @XxxArgsConstructor is present means it gets ignored, but until now lombok didn't warn you about this. --- .../messages-ecj/ConflictingStaticConstructorNames.java.messages | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 test/transform/resource/messages-ecj/ConflictingStaticConstructorNames.java.messages (limited to 'test/transform/resource/messages-ecj/ConflictingStaticConstructorNames.java.messages') diff --git a/test/transform/resource/messages-ecj/ConflictingStaticConstructorNames.java.messages b/test/transform/resource/messages-ecj/ConflictingStaticConstructorNames.java.messages new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ecbf4a61 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/transform/resource/messages-ecj/ConflictingStaticConstructorNames.java.messages @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +1 warning Ignoring static constructor name: explicit @XxxArgsConstructor annotation present; its `staticName` parameter will be used. -- cgit