From ae54fa51ac6162a53dc0ac424d0ba17cdac89ba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Spilker <r.spilker@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 01:07:56 +0100
Subject: [i1180] generate ConstructorProperties also for (package) private
 constructors

---
 website/features/Constructor.html | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'website/features/Constructor.html')

diff --git a/website/features/Constructor.html b/website/features/Constructor.html
index 88a8f6ac..407f54ad 100644
--- a/website/features/Constructor.html
+++ b/website/features/Constructor.html
@@ -76,8 +76,7 @@
 					signals you must know what you're doing.
 				</p><p>
 					The <code>@java.beans.ConstructorProperties</code> annotation is never generated for a constructor with no arguments. This also explains why <code>@NoArgsConstructor</code>
-					lacks the <code>suppressConstructorProperties</code> annotation method. The <code>@ConstructorProperties</code> annotation is also omitted for private constructors. The
-					generated static factory methods also do not get <code>@ConstructorProperties</code>, as this annotation can only be added to real constructors.
+					lacks the <code>suppressConstructorProperties</code> annotation method. The generated static factory methods also do not get <code>@ConstructorProperties</code>, as this annotation can only be added to real constructors.
 				</p><p>
 					<code>@XArgsConstructor</code> can also be used on an enum definition. The generated constructor will always be
 					private, because non-private constructors aren't legal in enums. You don't have to specify <code>AccessLevel.PRIVATE</code>.
-- 
cgit