From e1c39bbc601408decb0ae147d181708a5af41307 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Reinier Zwitserloot Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:23:15 +0200 Subject: javac builder implementation. Passes all tests. Added toString() impl for builders in both eclipse and javac. Added all documentation, though it'll need some reviewing. --- website/features/experimental/Accessors.html | 2 +- website/features/experimental/Builder.html | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ website/features/experimental/index.html | 2 + 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 website/features/experimental/Builder.html (limited to 'website/features') diff --git a/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html b/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html index dce77d32..3ca79de5 100644 --- a/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html +++ b/website/features/experimental/Accessors.html @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
diff --git a/website/features/experimental/Builder.html b/website/features/experimental/Builder.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5ba74a27 --- /dev/null +++ b/website/features/experimental/Builder.html @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ + + + + + + + + EXPERIMENTAL - @Builder +
+
+
+ +

@Builder

+ +
+

Since

+

+ @Builder was introduced as experimental feature in lombok v0.11.10. +

+
+
+

Experimental

+

+ Experimental because: +

    +
  • New feature - community feedback requested.
  • +
  • This feature will move to the core package soon.
  • +
+ Current status: sure thing - This feature will move to the core package soon. +
+
+

Overview

+

+ The @Builder annotation produces complex builder APIs for your classes. +

+ @Builder lets you automatically produce the code required to have your class be instantiable with code such as:
+ Person.builder().name("Adam Savage").city("San Francisco").worksAt("Mythbusters").build(); +

+ @Builder can be placed on a class, or on a constructor, or on a static method. While the "on a class" and "on a constructor" + mode are the most common use-case, @Builder is most easily explained with the "static method" use-case. +

+ A static method annotated with @Builder (from now on called the target) causes the following 7 things to be generated:

    +
  • An inner static class named FooBuilder, with the same type arguments as the static method (called the builder).
  • +
  • In the builder: One private non-static non-final field for each parameter of the target.
  • +
  • In the builder: A package private no-args empty constructor.
  • +
  • In the builder: A 'setter'-like method for each parmeter of the target: It has the same type as that parameter and the same name. + It returns the builder itself, so that the setter calls can be chained, as in the above example.
  • +
  • In the builder: A build() method which calls the static method, passing in each field. It returns the same type that the + target returns.
  • +
  • In the builder: A sensible toString() implementation.
  • +
  • In the class containing the target: A builder() method, which creates a new instance of the builder.
  • +
+ Each listed generated element will be silently skipped if that element already exists (disregarding parameter counts and looking only at names). This + includes the builder itself: If that class already exists, lombok will simply start injecting fields and methods inside this already existing + class, unless of course the fields / methods to be injected already exist. +

+ Now that the "static method" mode is clear, putting a @Builder annotation on a constructor functions similarly; effectively, + constructors are just static methods that have a special syntax to invoke them: Their 'return type' is the class they construct, and their + type parameters are the same as the type parameters of the class itself. +

+ Finally, applying @Builder to a class is as if you added @AllArgsConstructor(acces = AccessLevel.PACKAGE) to the class and applied the + @Builder annotation to this all-args-constructor. Note that this constructor is only generated if there is no explicit + constructor present in the so annotated class, but this @AllArgsConstructor has priority over any other implicitly + generated lombok constructor (such as @Data and @Value). If an explicit constructor is present, no constructor is generated, + but the builder will be created with the assumption that this constructor exists. If you've written another constructor, you'll get a compilation error.
+ The solution is to either let lombok write this constructor (delete your own), or, annotate your constructor instead. +

+ The name of the builder class is FoobarBuilder, where Foobar is the simplified, title-cased form of the return type of the + target - that is, the name of your type for @Builder on constructors and types, and the name of the return type for @Builder + on static methods. For example, if @Builder is applied to a class named com.yoyodyne.FancyList<T>, then the builder name will be + FancyListBuilder<T>. If @Builder is applied to a static method that returns void, the builder will be named + VoidBuilder. +

+ The only configurable aspect of builder are the builder's class name (default: return type + 'Builder'), the build() method's name, and the + builder() method's name:
+ @Builder(builderClassName = "HelloWorldBuilder", buildMethodName = "execute", builderMethodName = "helloWorld") +

+
+
+
+

With Lombok

+
@HTML_PRE@
+
+
+
+

Vanilla Java

+
@HTML_POST@
+
+
+
+
+

Small print

+

+ Another strategy for fluent APIs is that the programmer using your library statically imports your 'builder' method. In this case, you might want to name your builder + method equal to your type's name. So, the builder method for a class called Person would become person(). This is nicer if the builder method + is statically imported. +

+ If the return type of your target static method is a type parameter (such as T), lombok will enforce an explicit builder class name. +

+ You don't HAVE to use @Builder to build anything; you can for example put it on a static method that has lots of parameter to improve the API of it. + In this case, we suggest you use buildMethodName = to rename the build method to execute() instead. +

+ The builder class will NOT get an auto-generated implementation of hashCode or equals methods! These would suggest that it is sensible to use + instances of a builder as keys in a set or map. However, that's not a sensible thing to do. Hence, no hashCode or equals. +

+ Generics are sorted out for you. +

+
+
+ +
+
+
+ + + diff --git a/website/features/experimental/index.html b/website/features/experimental/index.html index 24fbb541..d0a086a0 100644 --- a/website/features/experimental/index.html +++ b/website/features/experimental/index.html @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Features that receive positive community feedback and which seem to produce clean, flexible code will eventually become accepted as a core feature and move out of the experimental package.
+
@Builder
+
It's like drinking tea with an extended pinky while wearing a monocle: No-hassle fancy-pants APIs for object creation!
@Accessors
A more fluent API for getters and setters.
@ExtensionMethod
-- cgit