From 52582dc10ea1b5ea4a1dbb71831a442056354990 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:50:19 +0100
Subject: @ToString, @Getter, and @XArgsConstructor now work on, and are legal
 on, enums. Docs have been updated.

Behaviour of @XArgsConstructor when its placement makes no sense (i.e. when annotating an interface with them) is no longer 'throw weird errors', but has been brought in line with the others: A nice error message is generated.

Fixes issue #175
---
 website/features/Constructor.html  | 3 +++
 website/features/GetterSetter.html | 3 +++
 website/features/ToString.html     | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

(limited to 'website')

diff --git a/website/features/Constructor.html b/website/features/Constructor.html
index 6a7cfd2f..072e46ed 100644
--- a/website/features/Constructor.html
+++ b/website/features/Constructor.html
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
 					The <code>@java.beans.ConstructorProperties</code> annotation is never generated for a constructor with no arguments. This also explains why <code>@NoArgsConstructor</code>
 					lacks the <code>suppressConstructorProperties</code> annotation method. The <code>@ConstructorProperties</code> annotation is also omitted for private constructors. The
 					generated static factory methods also do not get <code>@ConstructorProperties</code>, as this annotation can only be added to real constructors.
+				</p><p>
+					<code>@XArgsConstructor</code> can also be used on an enum definition. The generated constructor will always be
+					private, because non-private constructors aren't legal in enums. You don't have to specify <code>AccessLevel.PRIVATE</code>.
 				</p>
 			</div>
 		</div>
diff --git a/website/features/GetterSetter.html b/website/features/GetterSetter.html
index fd4ed17d..8e7a1ede 100644
--- a/website/features/GetterSetter.html
+++ b/website/features/GetterSetter.html
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
 				</p><p>
 				Using the <code>AccessLevel.NONE</code> access level simply generates nothing. It's useful only in combination with
 				<a href="Data.html"><code>@Data</code></a> or a class-wide <code>@Getter</code> or <code>@Setter</code>.
+				</p><p>
+					<code>@Getter</code> can also be used on enums. <code>@Setter</code> can't, not for a technical reason, but
+					for a pragmatic one: Setters on enums are an extremely bad idea.
 				</p>
 			</div>
 		</div>
diff --git a/website/features/ToString.html b/website/features/ToString.html
index e350c265..8ac29bb1 100644
--- a/website/features/ToString.html
+++ b/website/features/ToString.html
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@
 				</p><p>
 				If a getter exists for a field to be included, it is called instead of using a direct field reference. This behaviour can be suppressed:<br />
 				<code>@ToString(doNotUseGetters = true)</code>
+				</p><p>
+					<code>@ToString</code> can also be used on an enum definition.
 				</p>
 			</div>
 		</div>
-- 
cgit