From 28b7866aee68ca844406bea4761d630a7913188d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Crozet Sébastien Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:40:00 +0100 Subject: Switch to [u32; DIM] instead of Point for element indices. --- .../solver/joint_constraint/revolute_position_constraint_wide.rs | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/dynamics/solver') diff --git a/src/dynamics/solver/joint_constraint/revolute_position_constraint_wide.rs b/src/dynamics/solver/joint_constraint/revolute_position_constraint_wide.rs index 44da104..e2d140d 100644 --- a/src/dynamics/solver/joint_constraint/revolute_position_constraint_wide.rs +++ b/src/dynamics/solver/joint_constraint/revolute_position_constraint_wide.rs @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ use super::{RevolutePositionConstraint, RevolutePositionGroundConstraint}; -use crate::dynamics::{IntegrationParameters, JointIndex, RevoluteJoint, RigidBody}; -use crate::math::{AngularInertia, Isometry, Point, Real, Rotation, Vector, SIMD_WIDTH}; -use crate::utils::WAngularInertia; -use na::Unit; +use crate::dynamics::{IntegrationParameters, RevoluteJoint, RigidBody}; +use crate::math::{Isometry, Real, SIMD_WIDTH}; // TODO: this does not uses SIMD optimizations yet. #[derive(Debug)] -- cgit