[test] Missing after-X files used to be an implicit 'just ignore the content' signal; now you need an explicit directive to allow this behaviour.

[configuration] added tests for @Accessors configuration key implementations.

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/transform/resource/after-ecj/AccessorsConfiguration.java b/test/transform/resource/after-ecj/AccessorsConfiguration.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6678e020
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/transform/resource/after-ecj/AccessorsConfiguration.java
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+class AccessorsConfiguration {
+  private @lombok.Getter @lombok.Setter @lombok.experimental.Accessors(fluent = true) String m_FieldName = "";
+  AccessorsConfiguration() {
+    super();
+  }
+  public @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") String fieldName() {
+    return this.m_FieldName;
+  }
+  public @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") void fieldName(final String m_FieldName) {
+    this.m_FieldName = m_FieldName;
+  }
+}
+@lombok.experimental.Accessors(prefix = {}) class AccessorsConfiguration2 {
+  private @lombok.Setter String m_FieldName = "";
+  AccessorsConfiguration2() {
+    super();
+  }
+  public @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") void setM_FieldName(final String m_FieldName) {
+    this.m_FieldName = m_FieldName;
+  }
+}
+@lombok.experimental.Accessors(chain = true) class AccessorsConfiguration3 {
+  private @lombok.Setter String fFieldName = "";
+  AccessorsConfiguration3() {
+    super();
+  }
+  public @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("all") AccessorsConfiguration3 setFieldName(final String fFieldName) {
+    this.fFieldName = fFieldName;
+    return this;
+  }
+}