[i659] suppression of @ConstructorProperties should use config instead. Also modified all onX examples to use two underscores.

2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/website/features/experimental/Wither.html b/website/features/experimental/Wither.html
index b334cd7c..46d3b08b 100644
--- a/website/features/experimental/Wither.html
+++ b/website/features/experimental/Wither.html
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 				<code>@Wither(level = AccessLevel.PROTECTED)</code>. Also like <a href="../GetterSetter.html"><code>@Setter</code></a>, you can also put a <code>@Wither</code> annotation on a type, which means
 				a 'wither' is generated for each field (even non-final fields).
 			</p><p>
-				To put annotations on the generated method, you can use <code>onMethod=@_({@AnnotationsHere})</code>; to put annotations on the only parameter of a generated wither method, you can use <code>onParam=@_({@AnnotationsHere})</code>. Be careful though! This is an experimental feature. For more details see the documentation on the <a href="onX.html">onX</a> feature.
+				To put annotations on the generated method, you can use <code>onMethod=@__({@AnnotationsHere})</code>; to put annotations on the only parameter of a generated wither method, you can use <code>onParam=@__({@AnnotationsHere})</code>. Be careful though! This is an experimental feature. For more details see the documentation on the <a href="onX.html">onX</a> feature.
 			</p><p>
 				<em>NEW in lombok v1.12.0:</em> javadoc on the field will now be copied to generated withers. Normally, all text is copied, and <code>@param</code> is <em>moved</em> to the wither, whilst <code>@return</code> lines are stripped from the wither's javadoc. Moved means: Deleted from the field's javadoc. It is also possible to define unique text for the wither's javadoc. To do that, you create a 'section' named <code>WITHER</code>. A section is a line in your javadoc containing 2 or more dashes, then the text 'WITHER', followed by 2 or more dashes, and nothing else on the line. If you use sections, <code>@return</code> and <code>@param</code> stripping / copying for that section is no longer done (move the <code>@param</code> line into the section).
 			</p>
diff --git a/website/features/experimental/onX.html b/website/features/experimental/onX.html
index 66b0164f..530d98a4 100644
--- a/website/features/experimental/onX.html
+++ b/website/features/experimental/onX.html
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 			</p><p>
 			<code>@Setter</code> and <code>@Wither</code> support <code>onParam</code> in addition to <code>onMethod</code>; annotations listed will be put on the only parameter that the generated method has.
 			</p><p>
-			The syntax is a little strange; to use any of the 3 <code>onX</code> features, you must wrap the annotations to be applied to the constructor / method / parameter in <code>@_(@AnnotationGoesHere)</code>. To apply multiple annotations, use <code>@_({@Annotation1, @Annotation2})</code>. The annotations can themselves obviously have parameters as well.
+			The syntax is a little strange; to use any of the 3 <code>onX</code> features, you must wrap the annotations to be applied to the constructor / method / parameter in <code>@__(@AnnotationGoesHere)</code>. To apply multiple annotations, use <code>@__({@Annotation1, @Annotation2})</code>. The annotations can themselves obviously have parameters as well.
 			</p>
 		</div>
 		<div class="snippets">
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 		<div class="overview">
 			<h3>Small print</h3><div class="smallprint">
 				<p>
-				The reason of the weird syntax is to make this feature work in javac 7 compilers; the <code>@_</code> type is an annotation reference to the annotation type <code>_</code> (underscore) which doesn't actually exist; this makes javac 7 delay aborting the compilation process due to an error because it is possible an annotation processor will later create the <code>_</code> type. Instead, lombok applies the annotations and removes the references so that the error will never actually occur. The point is: The <code>_</code> type <em>must not exist</em>, otherwise the feature does not work. In the rare case that the <code>_</code> type does exist (and is imported or in the package), you can simply add more underscores. Technically any non-existent type would work, but to maintain consistency and readability and catch erroneous use, lombok considers it an error if the 'wrapper' annotation is anything but a series of underscores.
+				The reason of the weird syntax is to make this feature work in javac 7 compilers; the <code>@__</code> type is an annotation reference to the annotation type <code>_</code> (underscore) which doesn't actually exist; this makes javac 7 delay aborting the compilation process due to an error because it is possible an annotation processor will later create the <code>_</code> type. Instead, lombok applies the annotations and removes the references so that the error will never actually occur. The point is: The <code>_</code> type <em>must not exist</em>, otherwise the feature does not work. In the rare case that the <code>_</code> type does exist (and is imported or in the package), you can simply add more underscores. Technically any non-existent type would work, but to maintain consistency and readability and catch erroneous use, lombok considers it an error if the 'wrapper' annotation is anything but a series of underscores.
 				</p><p>
 				To reiterate: This feature can disappear at any time; if you use this feature, be prepared to adjust your code when we find a nicer way of implementing this feature, or, if a future version of javac forces us to remove this feature entirely with no alternative.
 				</p><p>