diff options
| author | Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com> | 2010-12-28 16:50:19 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier@zwitserloot.com> | 2010-12-28 16:51:02 +0100 |
| commit | 52582dc10ea1b5ea4a1dbb71831a442056354990 (patch) | |
| tree | afd0794b7360e5c174a79a54c54a50aacfe31efc /website | |
| parent | d80139fa8f21b1e6c7fad0a0607986d7b246a06f (diff) | |
| download | lombok-52582dc10ea1b5ea4a1dbb71831a442056354990.tar.gz lombok-52582dc10ea1b5ea4a1dbb71831a442056354990.tar.bz2 lombok-52582dc10ea1b5ea4a1dbb71831a442056354990.zip | |
@ToString, @Getter, and @XArgsConstructor now work on, and are legal on, enums. Docs have been updated.
Behaviour of @XArgsConstructor when its placement makes no sense (i.e. when annotating an interface with them) is no longer 'throw weird errors', but has been brought in line with the others: A nice error message is generated.
Fixes issue #175
Diffstat (limited to 'website')
| -rw-r--r-- | website/features/Constructor.html | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | website/features/GetterSetter.html | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | website/features/ToString.html | 2 |
3 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/website/features/Constructor.html b/website/features/Constructor.html index 6a7cfd2f..072e46ed 100644 --- a/website/features/Constructor.html +++ b/website/features/Constructor.html @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ The <code>@java.beans.ConstructorProperties</code> annotation is never generated for a constructor with no arguments. This also explains why <code>@NoArgsConstructor</code> lacks the <code>suppressConstructorProperties</code> annotation method. The <code>@ConstructorProperties</code> annotation is also omitted for private constructors. The generated static factory methods also do not get <code>@ConstructorProperties</code>, as this annotation can only be added to real constructors. + </p><p> + <code>@XArgsConstructor</code> can also be used on an enum definition. The generated constructor will always be + private, because non-private constructors aren't legal in enums. You don't have to specify <code>AccessLevel.PRIVATE</code>. </p> </div> </div> diff --git a/website/features/GetterSetter.html b/website/features/GetterSetter.html index fd4ed17d..8e7a1ede 100644 --- a/website/features/GetterSetter.html +++ b/website/features/GetterSetter.html @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ </p><p> Using the <code>AccessLevel.NONE</code> access level simply generates nothing. It's useful only in combination with <a href="Data.html"><code>@Data</code></a> or a class-wide <code>@Getter</code> or <code>@Setter</code>. + </p><p> + <code>@Getter</code> can also be used on enums. <code>@Setter</code> can't, not for a technical reason, but + for a pragmatic one: Setters on enums are an extremely bad idea. </p> </div> </div> diff --git a/website/features/ToString.html b/website/features/ToString.html index e350c265..8ac29bb1 100644 --- a/website/features/ToString.html +++ b/website/features/ToString.html @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ </p><p> If a getter exists for a field to be included, it is called instead of using a direct field reference. This behaviour can be suppressed:<br /> <code>@ToString(doNotUseGetters = true)</code> + </p><p> + <code>@ToString</code> can also be used on an enum definition. </p> </div> </div> |